Saturday, June 1, 2019

Canterbury Tales :: essays research papers

Canterbury TalesCharacter AnalysisChaucers greatest work came after everything else. Canterbury tales was the last of his literary works. It followed such stories as Troilus and Creseyde. It is considered as iodin of the greatest works of literature during the English Middle Age. The ironic thing is that it wasnt even finished the way Chaucer had intended it to. He had planned to shit over a hundred tales, four for each pilgrim. He ended up with twenty-four, less than one for each pilgrim. One wonders if he had finished how a great deal better would it have been. The story is a unique one, especially during the time in which it was written. Rather than a traditional author story format, Chaucer uses a contrasting method to spin a number of different types of stories. By relative different stories through different pilgrims Chaucer uses their attitudes and characteristics so that he may tell tales of umteen different varieties and styles. This shows the many different creative sides and motives of the great author. He was not the first to use such a method, but he may be one of the most famous, earliest of its users. Among the number of characters and different storytellers you come across a character by the name of Robin. His standing among the company was the moth miller, so that was what he would be more commonly known. Immediately following the Knight the Miller had a pretty tough act to follow. The Knight was obviously of high standing, and would previously tell a noble tale with a moralistic flavor to it. It would leave the crowd in state of appreciation for someone of his stature. When his tale was make the people knew why it was that he was Knight. Although, when the Miller was done the people did also realize why he was the Miller. When the Knights tale had finished the Miller decided it was his turn for the spotlight. Chaucer makes it quite easy to understand the contrast in the characters. Especially making the claims one right after the oth er. The comparison is easily made. The boozy boisterous Miller pipes up claiming to have a tale that would contend with the Knights for being noble and attractive. Sensing the drunkenness, the host speaks up telling the Miller to save his tale for another time knowing of what was to come. The loud and cocky Miller overpowers him.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.